Con Mod Article in wikipedia?
I was thinking, you all guys must know the Wikipedia, and if not, then go rot in hell.
I wondered if you guys deemed it necesary for Con Mod to pass to inmortality by having it's own article in Wikipedia, so people from all over the globe may read it, and perhaps atract new , unaware potential conners (ConMod Midi-Chlorians).
So as always, who is with me?
You can fild the young article Here
I wondered if you guys deemed it necesary for Con Mod to pass to inmortality by having it's own article in Wikipedia, so people from all over the globe may read it, and perhaps atract new , unaware potential conners (ConMod Midi-Chlorians).
So as always, who is with me?
You can fild the young article Here
Comments
I'm outraged.
Only a Wikipedia admin can delete without a history page.
Eolk tracked down the IP to Vegas, and therefore my computer. So yah. Guilty.
never listen to people who say they "know what they're talking about".
People say, "let the professionals do it." bad idea, because then you're at the mercy of someone elses human flaws, when they mess up, you get screwed. I'll cut you Eolk.
neva!
(ok)
Why you ask? 'cus I agree. Con Mod isn't quite broadcasted enough to become recognized by a third party.
Con mod is the few, the proud, and the n00bs. Everyone outside barely knows it as a CTF game. Want a separate article? Get the media.
If you don't think it's 'notable' enough for its own article you clearly haven't seen all the other sorts of obscure articles up there. While the mod - and the game itself - may seem comparitivly low-key when put up against more recent mainstream hits, it was actually quite popular when it was new, and a good deal of the people who played the game in its heyday would have some recollection of the mod.
Regardless, a good article has nothing to do with how popular it is, and shouldn't be a reason to think the information shouldn't exist.
Actually, anyone can find the IP address of the person who made that specific revision by clicking the history tab.
Leave the thinking to alviss, as he has competant stuff to think about
If construction wasn't a third party mod and, I'd probably say that it'd have more of a chance. If the Construction mod article had been written at the peak of it's popularity, it'd also have maybe more of a chance also. I dunno. If you guys want to push and actually put a mod entry on Wikipedia, I'll help out.
There was a Wikipedia article about con mod, you had two options, enlarge it or be an asshole and say "no!, I don't think Con-Mod should have an article of it's own so I will spoil it for everyone" and deleted the thing.
Now, why did I make an article about Con-Mod in Wikipedia?, because Con-Mod has proved to be a great platform for many things, and it could be used as inspiration for future generations of games (I'm not being corny).
You however, decided to stick your ego before everyone else and delete an article you didn't make.
If you don't think Con-Mod is worthy enough to have an article in wikipedia, leave it there, otherwise actually do something and help enlarge it.
I'm starting the article again because that shitty sub title we have is not worthy.
Oh, and one last thing, my friend who thinks he knows what he's talking about.
The wikipedia was made to inform, not to censor and save space, otherwise users wouldn't be able to edit it.
I've been a user in wikipedia for years now, and I've seen several, and I mean it, several articles about stupid , minimalist things.
Now, if you're not actually gonna help with the article, Fuck off.
I am a Wikipedia Tutnum/Veteran Editor with Rollback privs who is currently M.I.A. I've seen stupid articles on Wikipedia. Just because they're stupid doesn't mean they lack context or notability.
And T2 Con Mod has shitloads of notability, so keep your words in your mouth.
And I retain my words, if you're not gonna help, fuck off, go brag about yourself somewhere else (Yes, I get pissed off too, just like you)
You don't have to believe me or do what I say, I'm just putting forth my thoughts. Go ahead and do whatever. I'll support your what your actions are either way. :rolleyes:
Wikipedia sure turns you into an elitist, doesn't it?
I didn't want to make a giant ad that said "BUILD SHIT, KILL ZOMBIES AND HAVE FUN LOL"
And Eolk, it's not that I'm elitist, it's just that it pisses me off when people go around degrading my beliefs.
Do it then, and start doing something for the article, and for your people, comrade.
To Deflun: Stop fighting over an article on wikipedia, you're not showing any of us that you should even touch this article. Eolk gave you some helpful advice and you jumped the gun on him because your poorly written article was deleted by an administrator who thought, "Hey! What the heck is this junk?"
Keep the ego out of the article, and don't get pissed when someone replaces your photo with something presentable.
He/She is an idiot.
Edit:
Nevermind, I just noticed there is one already. :rolleyes: